Topic summary
⁠19%1 analyzed article/video1,010 analyzed words
BS Summary: These AI Spending results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Overconfidence Bias, and Halo Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 232 hits. Analysis detected 1,480 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,040 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠15% (18,864 of 22,098 topics). This AI Spending is better (less manipulative) than 85.40% of the peer group.
AI Spending
Topic details
Total words: 4,040
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

15% percentile
025507510014.6% percentile
1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.1%0.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 5.7%5.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.1%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos