Topic summary
⁠72%2 analyzed articles/videos1,161 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ai Research results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.9% saturation with 1,108 hits. Analysis detected 5,517 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,644 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (7,432 of 24,545 topics). This Ai Research is worse (more manipulative) than 69.70% of the peer group.
Ai Research
Topic details
Total words: 4,644
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

70% percentile
025507510069.7% percentile
3.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 20.5%20.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Topic 5.6%5.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 23.9%23.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 23.9%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 20.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Horn Effect: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 1.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos