Topic summary
82% 6 analyzed articles/videos 4,405 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ai Policy results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Biased Writer Voice , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 1,726 hits . Analysis detected 19,520 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,124 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 50% (11,927 of 23,761 topics). This Ai Policy is better (less manipulative) than 50.20% of the peer group. Ai Policy
Topic details
Total words: 17,124
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.8% percentile 2.4% BS Score6 analyzed articles17.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.1% 10.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.9% 7.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.9% 5.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.1% 6.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.6%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst