Topic summary
⁠65%2 analyzed articles/videos1,526 analyzed words
BS Summary: These AI Investment results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 543 hits. Analysis detected 4,274 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,104 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (14,108 of 23,169 topics). This AI Investment is better (less manipulative) than 60.90% of the peer group.
AI Investment
Topic details
Total words: 6,104
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

39% percentile
025507510039.1% percentile
2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.9%7.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.3%1.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 8.9%8.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.9%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos