Topic summary
⁠93%5 analyzed articles/videos3,416 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ai In Marketing results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Appeal to Authority, and Overconfidence Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 2,105 hits. Analysis detected 17,525 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,664 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (8,352 of 22,261 topics). This Ai In Marketing is worse (more manipulative) than 62.50% of the peer group.
Ai In Marketing
Topic details
Total words: 13,664
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

63% percentile
025507510062.5% percentile
3.1% BS Score5 analyzed articles13.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.0%6.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 11.9%11.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 7.6%7.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 15.4%15.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 7.5%7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 6.5%6.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 8.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 6.5%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Begging the Question: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos