Topic summary
83% 5 analyzed articles/videos 3,477 analyzed words
BS Summary: These AI Competition results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 1,830 hits . Analysis detected 18,246 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,822 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 37% (14,787 of 23,346 topics). This AI Competition is better (less manipulative) than 63.30% of the peer group. AI Competition
Topic details
Total words: 18,822
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.7% percentile 2.0% BS Score5 analyzed articles18.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.0% 7.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 9.7% 9.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst