Topic summary
10% 5 analyzed articles/videos 1,080 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Accidents & Disasters results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Confirmation Bias , and Recency Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 347 hits . Analysis detected 1,631 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,660 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 40% (14,451 of 24,024 topics). This Accidents & Disasters is better (less manipulative) than 60.20% of the peer group. Accidents & Disasters
Topic details
Total words: 4,660
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.8% percentile 2.1% BS Score5 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst