Topic summary
⁠80%1 analyzed article/video1,427 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Abortion Pill Access results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 663 hits. Analysis detected 6,024 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,708 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (7,903 of 23,188 topics). This Abortion Pill Access is worse (more manipulative) than 65.90% of the peer group.
Abortion Pill Access
Topic details
Total words: 5,708
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

66% percentile
025507510065.9% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.6%10.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.1%7.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.6%11.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 9.1%9.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.6%11.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 2.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 3.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos