Speaker summary
49% 1 analyzed article/video 306 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Yan results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Appeal to Emotion , and Optimism Bias , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 22.7% saturation with 95 hits . Analysis detected 351 faulty-reasoning hits from 306 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.3% and a BS Rank of 12% (40,041 of 45,128 speakers). This Yan is better (less manipulative) than 88.70% of the peer group. Yan
Speaker details
Total words: 306
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.3% percentile 9.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos306 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 22.7% 22.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 14.3% 14.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 12.4% 12.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 4.8% 4.8% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 13.9% 13.9% Circular Reasoning Sitewide 0.1% Speaker 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 7.4% 7.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Anecdotal: Speaker 22.7%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 15.9% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 1.1% Optimism Bias: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Recency Bias: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 2.7% Circular Reasoning: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 0.1% Anecdotal Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst