Speaker summary
89%2 analyzed articles/videos106 analyzed words
BS Summary: These White House Rapid Response account results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Biased Writer Voice, and Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 60.4% saturation with 64 hits. Analysis detected 221 faulty-reasoning hits from 106 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 34.7% and a BS Rank of 56% (19,554 of 44,129 speakers). This White House Rapid Response account is worse (more manipulative) than 55.70% of the peer group.
White House Rapid Response account
Speaker details
Ranking context
Position among analyzed speakers
34.7% BS Score2 analyzed videos106 analyzed words
Reasoning profile
Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
Sitewide departure map
Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often