Speaker summary
⁠52%1 analyzed article/video141.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vaun Mayes results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Availability Heuristic, and Confirmation Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 34.5% saturation with 62.033 hits. Analysis detected 322.308 faulty-reasoning hits from 141.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 14% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (35,214 of 45,145 speakers). This Vaun Mayes is better (less manipulative) than 78.00% of the peer group.
Vaun Mayes
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠22%Vaun Mayes (selected)15%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 141.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

22% percentile
025507510022.0% percentile
14.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos141.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 34.5%34.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 21.0%21.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 10.7%10.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 8.6%8.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 16.2%16.2%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 10.7%10.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 15.3%15.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 8.1%8.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 10.7%10.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 7.7%7.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Anecdotal: Speaker 34.5%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 21.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 16.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 6.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 3.3%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos