Speaker summary
58% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,137 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Valena Beety results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Confirmation Bias , and Anecdotal , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 527.409 hits . Analysis detected 3,796.414 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,137 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 2% (44,612 of 45,145 speakers). This Valena Beety is better (less manipulative) than 98.80% of the peer group. Valena Beety
Speaker details
Total words: 3,137
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.2% percentile 3.4% BS Score3 analyzed videos3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 6.0% 6.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 15.0% 15.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 2.8% 2.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 14.2% 14.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 11.3% 11.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 0.4% 0.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Speaker 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 15.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Straw Man: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 0.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 1.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst