Publication summary
43% 33 analyzed articles/videos 44,426 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Appeal results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 13,168 hits . Analysis detected 96,487 faulty-reasoning hits from 194,078 analyzed words across 33 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 22% (453 of 575 publications). This The Appeal is better (less manipulative) than 78.70% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 194,078
Article count: 33
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.3% percentile 1.0% BS Score33 analyzed articles194.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 4.7% 4.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 3.2% 3.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 4.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 2.0% Bandwagon: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst