Speaker summary
⁠65%1 analyzed article/video88 analyzed words
BS Summary: These University of Pennsylvania results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 66 hits. Analysis detected 211 faulty-reasoning hits from 88 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 40% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (17,517 of 44,411 speakers). This University of Pennsylvania is worse (more manipulative) than 60.60% of the peer group.
University of Pennsylvania
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠61%University of Pennsylvania (selected)40%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 88
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

61% percentile
025507510060.6% percentile
40.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos88 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 39.8%39.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 35.2%35.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 39.8%39.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 25.0%25.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 39.8%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 39.8%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 35.2%, sitewide 0.0%Indoctrination: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos