Speaker summary
74% 2 analyzed articles/videos 514.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ty Cobb results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 32.8% saturation with 271 hits . Analysis detected 2,320.178 faulty-reasoning hits from 514.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 14.3% and a BS Rank of 23% (35,004 of 45,355 speakers). This Ty Cobb is better (less manipulative) than 77.20% of the peer group. Ty Cobb
Speaker details
Total words: 514.333
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.8% percentile 14.3% BS Score2 analyzed videos514.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 32.2% 32.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Speaker 24.9% 24.9% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 21.3% 21.3% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 18.6% 18.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 20.6% 20.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 23.3% 23.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 18.3% 18.3% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 12.0% 12.0% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 10.8% 10.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 24.4% 24.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 32.8%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 32.2%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias: Speaker 26.6%, sitewide 19.2% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 24.9%, sitewide 4.0% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 24.4%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 23.3%, sitewide 8.1% Slippery Slope: Speaker 21.3%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 20.6%, sitewide 5.3% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 18.6%, sitewide 1.9% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 18.3%, sitewide 7.5% False Dilemma: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 3.1% Burden of Proof: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 0.4% Recency Bias: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 6.9% Indoctrination: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 3.3% Begging the Question: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 1.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 1.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst