Speaker summary
74%2 analyzed articles/videos514.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ty Cobb results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 32.8% saturation with 271 hits. Analysis detected 2,320.178 faulty-reasoning hits from 514.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 14.3% and a BS Rank of 23% (35,004 of 45,355 speakers). This Ty Cobb is better (less manipulative) than 77.20% of the peer group.
Ty Cobb
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
23%Ty Cobb (selected)15%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 514.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

23% percentile
025507510022.8% percentile
14.3% BS Score2 analyzed videos514.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 32.2%32.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 24.9%24.9%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 21.3%21.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 18.6%18.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 20.6%20.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 23.3%23.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 18.3%18.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 12.0%12.0%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 10.8%10.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 24.4%24.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 32.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 32.2%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 26.6%, sitewide 19.2%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 24.9%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 24.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 23.3%, sitewide 8.1%Slippery Slope: Speaker 21.3%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 20.6%, sitewide 5.3%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 18.6%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 18.3%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 3.1%Burden of Proof: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 0.4%Recency Bias: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 6.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 1.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate