Speaker summary
89%1 analyzed article/video20 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tupac Staples results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 20 hits. Analysis detected 40 faulty-reasoning hits from 20 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 86% (6,124 of 42,163 speakers). This Tupac Staples is worse (more manipulative) than 85.50% of the peer group.
Tupac Staples
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
86%Tupac Staples (selected)100%
100%314 Action Fund100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 20
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

86% percentile
025507510085.5% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos20 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Optimism Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos