Speaker summary
⁠53%2 analyzed articles/videos371.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tony Vitello results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Bandwagon, Fundamental Attribution Error, and Straw Man, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 82 hits. Analysis detected 668.077 faulty-reasoning hits from 371.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠7% (42,199 of 45,352 speakers). This Tony Vitello is better (less manipulative) than 93.00% of the peer group.
Tony Vitello
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠7%Tony Vitello (selected)8%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 371.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

7% percentile
02550751007.0% percentile
7.2% BS Score2 analyzed videos371.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 16.9%16.9%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 16.9%16.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 5.7%5.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 14.7%14.7%Blind-Spot BiasSitewide 0.2%Speaker 8.4%8.4%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 10.4%10.4%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 7.3%7.3%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Speaker 4.3%4.3%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 19.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 11.1%Bandwagon: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 9.1%Blind-Spot Bias: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 0.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 5.2%Tu Quoque: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 0.2%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 0.2%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos