Speaker summary
⁠59%4 analyzed articles/videos57.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Storm Prediction Center results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 72.3% saturation with 73 hits. Analysis detected 105.682 faulty-reasoning hits from 57.667 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 57.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (10,203 of 42,496 speakers). This Storm Prediction Center is worse (more manipulative) than 76.00% of the peer group.
Storm Prediction Center
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠76%Storm Prediction Center (selected)58%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 57.667
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

76% percentile
025507510076.0% percentile
57.8% BS Score4 analyzed videos57.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 72.3%72.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 43.3%43.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 72.3%, sitewide 11.1%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 43.3%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos