Speaker summary
73%1 analyzed article/video183.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sharona Weiss results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Begging the Question, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 56.5% saturation with 114.403 hits. Analysis detected 636.315 faulty-reasoning hits from 183.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 19.6% and a BS Rank of 33% (26,530 of 39,467 speakers). This Sharona Weiss is better (less manipulative) than 67.20% of the peer group.
Sharona Weiss
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
33%Sharona Weiss (selected)20%
100%314 Action Fund100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 183.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

33% percentile
025507510032.8% percentile
19.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos183.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 56.5%56.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 33.2%33.2%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 29.9%29.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 46.0%46.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 3.6%3.6%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 13.0%13.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 13.0%13.0%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 10.3%10.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 17.2%17.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 8.8%8.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 56.5%, sitewide 7.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 46.0%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 33.2%, sitewide 2.0%Begging the Question: Speaker 29.9%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 20.5%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 17.2%, sitewide 11.1%Burden of Proof: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 0.4%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 2.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos