Speaker summary
⁠44%2 analyzed articles/videos196.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shannon Thoman-Black results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and False Dilemma, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 27.2% saturation with 80 hits. Analysis detected 244.414 faulty-reasoning hits from 196.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 18.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (30,925 of 44,515 speakers). This Shannon Thoman-Black is better (less manipulative) than 69.50% of the peer group.
Shannon Thoman-Black
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠31%Shannon Thoman-Black (selected)19%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 196.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

31% percentile
025507510030.5% percentile
18.1% BS Score2 analyzed videos196.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 27.2%27.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 30.5%30.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 8.5%8.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 8.5%8.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 16.0%16.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 30.5%, sitewide 15.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 27.2%, sitewide 0.8%Negativity Bias: Speaker 16.0%, sitewide 19.2%False Dilemma: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos