Speaker summary
⁠91%1 analyzed article/video46.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Senator Angus King (I-ME) results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Burden of Proof, and Confirmation Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 62 hits. Analysis detected 189.875 faulty-reasoning hits from 46.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 65% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (9,366 of 44,636 speakers). This Senator Angus King (I-ME) is worse (more manipulative) than 79.00% of the peer group.
Senator Angus King (I-ME)
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠79%Senator Angus King (I-ME) (selected)65%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 46.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

79% percentile
025507510079.0% percentile
65.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos46.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 2.0%Burden of Proof: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.4%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 7.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 26.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos