Speaker summary
61% 32 analyzed articles/videos 1,912.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Samsung results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , Halo Effect , and Overconfidence Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 20.4% saturation with 477.825 hits . Analysis detected 3,246.708 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,912.333 analyzed words across 32 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 3% (43,526 of 44,653 speakers). This Samsung is better (less manipulative) than 97.50% of the peer group. Samsung
Speaker details
Total words: 1,912.333
Article count: 32
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.5% percentile 4.6% BS Score32 analyzed videos1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 1.8% 1.8% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Speaker 13.3% 13.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 20.4% 20.4% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 8.5% 8.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 9.4% 9.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 5.6% 5.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 4.4% 4.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 9.3% 9.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 20.4%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 0.5% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 1.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 0.8% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 4.0% Begging the Question: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Appeal to Nature: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 0.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 0.0% Special Pleading: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst