Speaker summary
56% 8 analyzed articles/videos 611.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rosa DeLauro results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Special Pleading , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 16.5% saturation with 108.731 hits . Analysis detected 1,254.759 faulty-reasoning hits from 611.333 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.6% and a BS Rank of 6% (41,751 of 44,298 speakers). This Rosa DeLauro is better (less manipulative) than 94.30% of the peer group. Rosa DeLauro
Speaker details
Total words: 611.333
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.7% percentile 6.6% BS Score8 analyzed videos611.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 14.7% 14.7% Special Pleading Sitewide 0.3% Speaker 10.9% 10.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 9.3% 9.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 11.2% 11.2% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 7.4% 7.4% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 7.6% 7.6% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 8.0% 8.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 1.1% 1.1% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 7.3% 7.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 16.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 11.1% Special Pleading: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 0.3% Indoctrination: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 1.5% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 7.5% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 1.1% Begging the Question: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Bandwagon: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Burden of Proof: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst