Speaker summary
77%1 analyzed article/video176 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Robert Wright results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Slippery Slope, and Appeal to Authority, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 39.2% saturation with 69 hits. Analysis detected 169 faulty-reasoning hits from 176 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 24% and a BS Rank of 41% (26,683 of 45,145 speakers). This Robert Wright is better (less manipulative) than 59.10% of the peer group.
Robert Wright
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
41%Robert Wright (selected)25%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 176
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

41% percentile
025507510040.9% percentile
24.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos176 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 39.2%39.2%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 17.6%17.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 26.7%26.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 12.5%12.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Indoctrination: Speaker 39.2%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 26.7%, sitewide 15.9%Slippery Slope: Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 11.1%IndoctrinationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos