Speaker summary
⁠61%1 analyzed article/video174.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Robert Attermann results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Primacy Effect, and Framing Effect, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 42.7% saturation with 84 hits. Analysis detected 210 faulty-reasoning hits from 174.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13% and a BS Rank of ⁠20% (36,241 of 45,145 speakers). This Robert Attermann is better (less manipulative) than 80.30% of the peer group.
Robert Attermann
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠20%Robert Attermann (selected)13%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 174.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

20% percentile
025507510019.7% percentile
13.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos174.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 42.8%42.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 9.9%9.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 2.7%2.7%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 11.1%11.1%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Speaker 8.8%8.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 11.1%11.1%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Halo Effect: Speaker 42.8%, sitewide 6.7%Framing Effect: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 5.3%Primacy Effect: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 0.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 0.3%Loss Aversion: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 2.5%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos