Speaker summary
⁠84%1 analyzed article/video70 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rafael Claus results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 67.1% saturation with 47 hits. Analysis detected 188 faulty-reasoning hits from 70 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 67.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (8,601 of 43,223 speakers). This Rafael Claus is worse (more manipulative) than 80.10% of the peer group.
Rafael Claus
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠81%Rafael Claus (selected)68%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 70
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

80% percentile
025507510080.1% percentile
67.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos70 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 67.1%67.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 67.1%67.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 67.1%67.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 67.1%67.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 67.1%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 67.1%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 67.1%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Speaker 67.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos