Speaker summary
⁠43%4 analyzed articles/videos113 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oscar Wilde results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Unattributed Quote, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 24% saturation with 36 hits. Analysis detected 86.481 faulty-reasoning hits from 113 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 16.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (32,340 of 44,473 speakers). This Oscar Wilde is better (less manipulative) than 72.70% of the peer group.
Oscar Wilde
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠28%Oscar Wilde (selected)17%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

27% percentile
025507510027.3% percentile
16.5% BS Score4 analyzed videos113 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 23.6%23.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 6.4%6.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 24.0%24.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 12.0%12.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Speaker 24.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 23.6%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos