Speaker summary
53%3 analyzed articles/videos190 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Noe Diaz results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Optimism Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 34.2% saturation with 79.83 hits. Analysis detected 420.83 faulty-reasoning hits from 190 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 11.8% and a BS Rank of 17% (37,466 of 45,145 speakers). This Noe Diaz is better (less manipulative) than 83.00% of the peer group.
Noe Diaz
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
17%Noe Diaz (selected)12%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

17% percentile
025507510017.0% percentile
11.8% BS Score3 analyzed videos190 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 34.2%34.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 12.6%12.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 14.8%14.8%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 12.6%12.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 9.1%9.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 12.6%12.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 10.2%10.2%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 6.9%6.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 7.7%7.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 7.7%7.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 34.2%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 27.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 14.8%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 6.0%Bandwagon: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 3.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 7.5%Burden of Proof: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 0.4%Begging the Question: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Primacy Effect: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos