Speaker summary
⁠65%2 analyzed articles/videos72.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nelson Mandela results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 68% saturation with 58.506 hits. Analysis detected 75.506 faulty-reasoning hits from 72.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 40.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (17,430 of 45,061 speakers). This Nelson Mandela is worse (more manipulative) than 61.30% of the peer group.
Nelson Mandela
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠62%Nelson Mandela (selected)41%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 72.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

61% percentile
025507510061.3% percentile
40.8% BS Score2 analyzed videos72.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 68.0%68.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 13.5%13.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 68.0%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos