Author summary
48% 1 analyzed article/video 1,104 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jean Casella results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Authority , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 407 hits . Analysis detected 3,436 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,416 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 51% (4,653 of 9,487 authors). This Jean Casella is worse (more manipulative) than 51.00% of the peer group. Jean Casella
Author details
Total words: 4,416
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.0% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.6% 4.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.2% 9.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.2% 6.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.8%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Composition/Division: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst