Speaker summary
53% 19 analyzed articles/videos 1,689.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ned Lamont results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Overconfidence Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 178.681 hits . Analysis detected 1,788.579 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,689.333 analyzed words across 19 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 1% (44,669 of 45,120 speakers). This Ned Lamont is better (less manipulative) than 99.00% of the peer group. Ned Lamont
Speaker details
Total words: 1,689.333
Article count: 19
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.0% percentile 3.2% BS Score19 analyzed videos1.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 5.4% 5.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 9.6% 9.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 9.8% 9.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 1.2% 1.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 2.4% 2.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 3.7% 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 8.1% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 4.6% In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% No True Scotsman: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 0.1% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst