Author summary
33%1 analyzed article/video549 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eddy Martinez results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 185 hits. Analysis detected 617 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,647 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 68% (3,065 of 9,487 authors). This Eddy Martinez is worse (more manipulative) than 67.70% of the peer group.
Eddy Martinez
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
68%Eddy Martinez (selected)3%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,647
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

68% percentile
025507510067.7% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.1%4.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 11.2%11.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.4%3.4%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Author 2.3%2.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Author 11.2%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.5%Burden of Proof: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.4%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos