Speaker summary
⁠49%1 analyzed article/video218.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nancy Mirabal results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice and Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 66.5% saturation with 210 hits. Analysis detected 265 faulty-reasoning hits from 218.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 28% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (23,783 of 45,144 speakers). This Nancy Mirabal is better (less manipulative) than 52.70% of the peer group.
Nancy Mirabal
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠48%Nancy Mirabal (selected)28%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 218.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

47% percentile
025507510047.3% percentile
28.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos218.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 66.5%66.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 14.2%14.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Halo Effect: Speaker 66.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos