Speaker summary
⁠54%1 analyzed article/video44 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Montraevia Adams results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 87.9% saturation with 58 hits. Analysis detected 91 faulty-reasoning hits from 44 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 46% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (15,469 of 43,675 speakers). This Montraevia Adams is worse (more manipulative) than 64.60% of the peer group.
Montraevia Adams
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠65%Montraevia Adams (selected)46%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 44
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

65% percentile
025507510064.6% percentile
46.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos44 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 87.9%87.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 37.9%37.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 12.1%12.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 87.9%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 37.9%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos