Author summary
56% 9 analyzed articles/videos 3,066 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Patrick Reilly results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Biased Writer Voice , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22% saturation with 2,712 hits . Analysis detected 11,983 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,330 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 54% (4,126 of 8,881 authors). This Patrick Reilly is worse (more manipulative) than 53.50% of the peer group. Patrick Reilly
Author details
Total words: 12,330
Article count: 9
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
54% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.5% percentile 2.4% BS Score9 analyzed articles12.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.9% 9.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 11.7% 11.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.3% 5.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.8% 11.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 22.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst