Speaker summary
72% 2 analyzed articles/videos 503 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Molly Gray results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Anecdotal , and Halo Effect , with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 18% saturation with 104.396 hits . Analysis detected 1,182.033 faulty-reasoning hits from 503 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.4% and a BS Rank of 7% (37,355 of 40,165 speakers). This Molly Gray is better (less manipulative) than 93.00% of the peer group. Molly Gray
Speaker details
Total words: 503
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.0% percentile 7.4% BS Score2 analyzed videos503 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Speaker 22.4% 22.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 18.0% 18.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 17.5% 17.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 10.4% 10.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 11.4% 11.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 15.7% 15.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 4.6% 4.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Nature Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 4.7% 4.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 10.0% 10.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 22.4%, sitewide 4.0% Negativity Bias: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 19.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 18.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Speaker 17.5%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 15.7%, sitewide 8.1% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 11.4%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Nature: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 0.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst