Speaker summary
53%1 analyzed article/video67.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mitchell Schuster results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Actor-Observer Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Burden of Proof, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 82.1% saturation with 92 hits. Analysis detected 224 faulty-reasoning hits from 67.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.3% and a BS Rank of 54% (19,152 of 41,280 speakers). This Mitchell Schuster is worse (more manipulative) than 53.60% of the peer group.
Mitchell Schuster
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
54%Mitchell Schuster (selected)34%
100%314 Action Fund100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 67.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

54% percentile
025507510053.6% percentile
33.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos67.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 82.1%82.1%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 30.4%30.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 30.4%30.4%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 19.6%19.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 19.6%19.6%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 17.9%17.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 82.1%, sitewide 3.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 30.4%, sitewide 0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 30.4%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Speaker 19.6%, sitewide 0.4%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 19.6%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 17.9%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos