Speaker summary
⁠93%1 analyzed article/video11 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Missouri Attorney General results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 11 hits. Analysis detected 22 faulty-reasoning hits from 11 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠91% (4,049 of 43,506 speakers). This Missouri Attorney General is worse (more manipulative) than 90.70% of the peer group.
Missouri Attorney General
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠91%Missouri Attorney General (selected)100%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 11
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

91% percentile
025507510090.7% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos11 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos