Speaker summary
⁠70%1 analyzed article/video26 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Miles O’Brien results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 13 hits. Analysis detected 26 faulty-reasoning hits from 26 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠69% (13,950 of 44,911 speakers). This Miles O’Brien is worse (more manipulative) than 68.90% of the peer group.
Miles O’Brien
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠69%Miles O’Brien (selected)50%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 26
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

69% percentile
025507510068.9% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos26 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos