Speaker summary
ā 82%1 analyzed article/video82.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Miguel Rojas results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Self-Serving Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 86.7% saturation with 80.625 hits. Analysis detected 175.625 faulty-reasoning hits from 82.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 40.8% and a BS Rank of ā 62% (17,436 of 45,145 speakers). This Miguel Rojas is worse (more manipulative) than 61.40% of the peer group.
Miguel Rojas
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%Paul Heideman1%
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Conor Heffernan1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Katy Longshore1%
ā 62%Miguel Rojas (selected)41%
ā 100%291 Brewhouse100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%2035 Initiative100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
ā 100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 82.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

61% percentile
025507510061.4% percentile
40.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos82.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 86.7%86.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 26.6%26.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 23.4%23.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 26.6%26.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%In-Group Bias: Speaker 86.7%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 26.6%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 26.6%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 23.4%, sitewide 0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos