Speaker summary
⁠81%2 analyzed articles/videos165 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Alan Thomas results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 49.7% saturation with 82 hits. Analysis detected 219 faulty-reasoning hits from 165 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 33.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (20,924 of 45,145 speakers). This Michael Alan Thomas is worse (more manipulative) than 53.70% of the peer group.
Michael Alan Thomas
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠54%Michael Alan Thomas (selected)34%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 165
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

54% percentile
025507510053.7% percentile
33.2% BS Score2 analyzed videos165 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 38.2%38.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 49.7%49.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 22.4%22.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 22.4%22.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 49.7%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 38.2%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 22.4%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 22.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos