Speaker summary
⁠76%1 analyzed article/video64.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Micah Richardson results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Loss Aversion, and Appeal to Emotion, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 54.4% saturation with 35.079 hits. Analysis detected 110.079 faulty-reasoning hits from 64.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 24% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (26,666 of 45,145 speakers). This Micah Richardson is better (less manipulative) than 59.10% of the peer group.
Micah Richardson
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠41%Micah Richardson (selected)25%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 64.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

41% percentile
025507510040.9% percentile
24.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos64.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 54.4%54.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 21.9%21.9%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 21.9%21.9%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 8.8%8.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 13.2%13.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 54.4%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 21.9%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Speaker 21.9%, sitewide 2.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 15.9%Slippery Slope: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos