Speaker summary
77%1 analyzed article/video102.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matthew Kent results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Self-Serving Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 88% saturation with 101.625 hits. Analysis detected 101.625 faulty-reasoning hits from 102.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 88% and a BS Rank of 84% (6,469 of 40,167 speakers). This Matthew Kent is worse (more manipulative) than 83.90% of the peer group.
Matthew Kent
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
84%Matthew Kent (selected)88%
100%314 Action Fund100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 102.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

84% percentile
025507510083.9% percentile
88.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos102.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 88.0%88.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 88.0%, sitewide 3.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos