Speaker summary
⁠50%1 analyzed article/video68 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matt McAlear results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias and Optimism Bias, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 51.5% saturation with 35 hits. Analysis detected 76 faulty-reasoning hits from 68 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 37.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (18,502 of 44,059 speakers). This Matt McAlear is worse (more manipulative) than 58.00% of the peer group.
Matt McAlear
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠58%Matt McAlear (selected)38%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 68
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

58% percentile
025507510058.0% percentile
37.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos68 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 51.5%51.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 51.5%51.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 8.8%8.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 51.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 51.5%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos