Speaker summary
85%2 analyzed articles/videos691 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Wilson results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Optimism Bias, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 38.2% saturation with 264.578 hits. Analysis detected 2,453.645 faulty-reasoning hits from 691 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 10.6% and a BS Rank of 15% (38,750 of 45,145 speakers). This Mark Wilson is better (less manipulative) than 85.80% of the peer group.
Mark Wilson
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
15%Mark Wilson (selected)11%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 691
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

14% percentile
025507510014.2% percentile
10.6% BS Score2 analyzed videos691 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 38.2%38.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 15.6%15.6%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 14.8%14.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 13.8%13.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 13.1%13.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 16.6%16.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 17.9%17.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 7.5%7.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 27.3%27.3%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 11.8%11.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 38.2%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 27.3%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 17.9%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 16.6%, sitewide 4.6%In-Group Bias: Speaker 16.4%, sitewide 6.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 15.6%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 14.8%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 8.1%Slippery Slope: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 3.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Straw Man: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 0.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 1.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 6.7%Begging the Question: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 1.5%Anecdotal: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate