Speaker summary
ā 70%1 analyzed article/video64 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marina Lacerda results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias and Appeal to Emotion, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 54 hits. Analysis detected 150 faulty-reasoning hits from 64 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 75% and a BS Rank of ā 82% (7,863 of 43,701 speakers). This Marina Lacerda is worse (more manipulative) than 82.00% of the peer group.
Marina Lacerda
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%Paul Heideman1%
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Conor Heffernan1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Katy Longshore1%
ā 82%Marina Lacerda (selected)75%
ā 100%291 Brewhouse100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%2035 Initiative100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
ā 100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 64
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

82% percentile
025507510082.0% percentile
75.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos64 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos