Speaker summary
⁠60%2 analyzed articles/videos76 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Luis Chavez results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 68 hits. Analysis detected 131.798 faulty-reasoning hits from 76 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 37.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (18,987 of 45,144 speakers). This Luis Chavez is worse (more manipulative) than 57.90% of the peer group.
Luis Chavez
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠58%Luis Chavez (selected)38%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 76
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

58% percentile
025507510057.9% percentile
37.1% BS Score2 analyzed videos76 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 43.7%43.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 17.6%17.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 43.7%, sitewide 1.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos