Speaker summary
⁠32%1 analyzed article/video156 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Long Beach Police Department results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof and Recency Bias, with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 33 hits. Analysis detected 75 faulty-reasoning hits from 156 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠13% (38,485 of 44,175 speakers). This Long Beach Police Department is better (less manipulative) than 87.10% of the peer group.
Long Beach Police Department
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠13%Long Beach Police Department (selected)11%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 156
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

13% percentile
025507510012.9% percentile
10.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos156 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 11.3%11.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 13.3%13.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 4.0%Burden of Proof: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 0.4%Recency Bias: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos