Speaker summary
⁠88%2 analyzed articles/videos1,012 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lisa Graves results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Confirmation Bias, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 41.3% saturation with 636 hits. Analysis detected 5,180.957 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,012 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 12.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠18% (37,213 of 45,144 speakers). This Lisa Graves is better (less manipulative) than 82.40% of the peer group.
Lisa Graves
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠18%Lisa Graves (selected)13%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 1,012
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

18% percentile
025507510017.6% percentile
12.1% BS Score2 analyzed videos1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 41.3%41.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 39.4%39.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 38.4%38.4%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 28.2%28.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 4.0%4.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 23.4%23.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 17.3%17.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 14.6%14.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 13.5%13.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 10.9%10.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 41.3%, sitewide 2.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 39.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 38.4%, sitewide 7.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 28.2%, sitewide 2.7%Framing Effect: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Ad Hominem: Speaker 23.4%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 22.1%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 19.2%False Dilemma: Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 11.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 3.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 6.9%Straw Man: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos