Speaker summary
80%2 analyzed articles/videos141.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Layal Bou Harfouch results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 43.9% saturation with 100 hits. Analysis detected 378.408 faulty-reasoning hits from 141.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 31.9% and a BS Rank of 53% (21,520 of 45,145 speakers). This Layal Bou Harfouch is worse (more manipulative) than 52.30% of the peer group.
Layal Bou Harfouch
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
53%Layal Bou Harfouch (selected)32%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 141.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

52% percentile
025507510052.3% percentile
31.9% BS Score2 analyzed videos141.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 45.1%45.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 43.9%43.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 35.2%35.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 28.1%28.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 28.9%28.9%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 10.5%10.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Speaker 45.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 43.9%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 35.2%, sitewide 9.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 28.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 28.1%, sitewide 15.9%Slippery Slope: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 1.7%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate